Education, work, finance & impact
The Meritocracy Paradox: Where Talent Management Strategies Go Wrong and How to Fix Them
By Emilio J. Castilla, the NTU Professor of Management and professor of work and organization studies in the MIT Sloan School of Management
Columbia University Press · 2025
Organizations often hail meritocracy as a fair and efficient way to identify, advance, and reward talent. But efforts to create a level playing field can be held back by talent management systems that confer rewards based on individual performance evaluations. In practice, these merit-based systems "may actually reinforce or create advantages for certain groups," Castilla contends.
From Summer 2026 recommended reading from MIT (MIT News). Cover image via Google Books.
More in Education, work, finance & impact →
- Bayesian Entrepreneurship · Erin L. Scott, 2026
- Launching from the Lab: Building a Deep-Tech Startup · Lita Nelsen, 2026
- The Art of Monetary Policy: Lessons from Sun Tzu for Central Banks · Kristin J. Forbes, 2026
- Disciplined Entrepreneurship for Climate and Energy Ventures: 24 Steps to Build Solutions for People and the Planet · Ben Soltoff, 2025
- There's Got to Be a Better Way: How to Deliver Results and Get Rid of the Stuff That Gets in the Way of Real Work · Nelson Repenning, 2025
- Accelerating Innovation: Competitive Advantage through Ecosystem Engagement · Phil Budden, 2025 · Summer 2025
- Retiring: Creating a Life That Works for You · Lotte Bailyn, 2025 · Summer 2025
- Entrepreneurship: Choice and Strategy · Erin L. Scott, 2024 · Summer 2025