I let a rival AI review my site, then shipped every fix in a day

I handed my site's docs to a rival AI and told it to find what's broken. One day later: ten verified issues, nine pull requests, and a set of permanent drift guards. A human signed off on each one. The interesting part wasn't the fixes, it was building guards so the same drift can't sneak back. https://www.jakelawrence.xyz/blog/the-review-loop

I gave a rival AI my site's docs and told it to find what's wrong. A day later: ten verified issues, nine PRs, and permanent drift guards. The fixes were nice. The guards that stop the same drift returning were the point. https://www.jakelawrence.xyz/blog/the-review-loop

I handed my site's own docs to a rival AI and told it to break the news to me: what's wrong here? One day later, ten verified issues, nine pull requests, and a human behind every merge. The real win wasn't the fixes. It was writing drift guards so the same problems can't quietly come back. https://www.jakelawrence.xyz/blog/the-review-loop

I gave this site's documentation to a rival AI and told it to find what's wrong. One day later: ten verified issues, nine pull requests, and a set of permanent drift guards, with a human signing off on each. The fixes were the easy part. The lasting value was building guards so the same drift can't sneak back in later. An adversarial review is cheap. A review loop that stays closed is the actual product. https://www.jakelawrence.xyz/blog/the-review-loop

I gave a rival AI my site's docs and said: find what's wrong. A day later: 10 verified issues, 9 PRs, and permanent drift guards, human-reviewed. The fixes were easy. https://www.jakelawrence.xyz/blog/the-review-loop

I handed a rival AI my site's docs and told it to find what's broken. A day later: 10 verified issues, 9 PRs, and permanent drift guards, with a human on every merge. The fixes were easy. The guards that keep the drift out are the real work. https://www.jakelawrence.xyz/blog/the-review-loop