Invisible InfrastructureCatalog record
09Accountability TrackerONGOING2025-07-21

AI Detection Accountability Tracker

Jake Lawrence · Higher Education Policy / STS · Field Data theme

Read online The interactive edition of this piece

Abstract

25 universities. 11 dimensions. 1.3 million students in scope. The empirical companion to the essays.

Mixed-methods policy audit examining AI detection implementation across 25 U.S. universities. Stratified sampling by Carnegie classification. 11-dimension evaluation framework.

Record details

Type
Accountability Tracker
Method
Mixed-methods policy audit
Field
Higher Education Policy / STS
Subjects
Higher Education Policy, STS
Status
Active (ongoing)
Released
2025-07-21

Cite and listen

Thesis

Related in the catalog

  • Stance DesignInteractive Essay

    Stance Design argues companies make invisible decisions about how AI relates to users. The tracker documents 25 universities making invisible decisions about how detection tools relate to students. Same asymmetry of design.

  • The New Sorting HatEssay

    The essay makes the theoretical argument. The tracker provides the empirical evidence.

  • The Sorting MachineEssay

    The tracker audits AI detection in universities. The Sorting Machine examines classification in K-12. Both document the gap between policy and experience.

Back to the release table · See it on the network · Machine-readable catalog

Need something like this built?

I design and ship AI tools, full-stack apps, and data pipelines — end to end, to production. Tell me the problem in a sentence; I'll give you an honest read on fit within a day.

Work with me →