The conviction: if you open enough orgs and plan hard enough, a network of entities becomes a revenue engine. But "engine for what?" Pick an objective — take-home, capital raised in a given year, throughput, lowest tax, asset protection — and the same recipes reorder completely. The simulator runs the same business through each structure and ranks them honestly, charging the real cost of every entity.
| Year | Net business income | Owner from ops (after tax) | Donation cost | Overhead | Take-home |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | $200,000 | $122,640 | -$0 | -$2,200 | $120,440 |
| 2 | $200,000 | $122,640 | -$0 | -$2,200 | $120,440 |
| 3 | $200,000 | $122,640 | -$0 | -$2,200 | $120,440 |
| 4 | $200,000 | $122,640 | -$0 | -$2,200 | $120,440 |
| 5 | $200,000 | $122,640 | -$0 | -$2,200 | $120,440 |
This is a deterministic model, not tax or investment advice. Take-home is real cash; capital-raising capacity and asset-protection points are coarse planning ratios, not market data. Overhead runs high on purpose: a network must earn its complexity. Exempt entities return $0 to the owner by law; pulling money back out is self-dealing/inurement and is rejected as invalid. Changing the objective changes the winner — that is the point.