A series about counting owes you a count you can open yourself. Here is what is in it, and what is not.
Every figure in this series comes from one small, public bundle of files, free for anyone to use. Open it and you get six plain tables, as spreadsheets or as data: the five counters and their rules, how many people each one recorded per year, the FBI's coverage numbers, and, new in this version, a table that matches the databases up against each other case by case.
None of it lives in a private database you have to trust me about. It is all written into the site's own code in the open, and updating it means editing a file and dating the change, so the history of every number is right there in public.
This release only publishes totals and summaries. It does not republish the individual records: no names, no ages, no home addresses of the people who died. Those belong to the original projects, under their own rules, and I link to them instead of copying them here.
You do not have to take my word for any of it. Three separate things keep the numbers honest:
If you want to cite it:
Lawrence, J. (2026). Counting the Killings: how the United States counts people killed by police, as open data (v0.2.0). jakelawrence.xyz/research/police-shootings.
If a society wants to deal with something, it first has to be able to count it. A count that nobody can check is barely better than no count at all. The five projects in this series each made their own count checkable. This bundle does the same for the comparison between them: open it, test it, argue with it, on the record. The last essay uses it to answer the hardest question in the whole series.